Skip to main content

Correlation between hospital charges, patient satisfaction, and physician communication

The positive correlation between hospital costs and quality was debunked long ago, nonetheless it's still interesting to look at the data in new ways. Here I've combined two different data sets: first I took the hospital charge data that was published earlier this year by CMS and compared it against patient satisfaction or "perception" data from HCAHPS:


Let me explain the graph. Each circle represents an individual hospital. The x-axis represents patient satisfaction as measured by the HCAHPS question representing the percentage of patients giving their inpatient visit a score of a "9" or a "10." The y-axis represents the average charge (the amount the hospital billed Medicare, not necessarily the amount the hospital actually got paid) by the hospital for management of sepsis, which I am using as a surrogate measure for hospital charges overall. I chose sepsis because it is a common medical syndrome for which we have lots of data and recommendations, and it is a high-risk syndrome whose proper treatment requires all the different moving parts of a hospital to be well functioning. Therefore, I think it is a good indication of hospital functioning and efficiency. Or, in other words, hospitals that follow sepsis protocols really well will probably have shorter hospital stays and therefore smaller charges (this is my hypothesis). The color of the circle represents to what degree the patients perceived that doctors communicated with them (HCAHPS data, see my other recent posts); green means the patients perceived more and better communication with the doctor and red the opposite.

The boundary cases are really interesting: Oklahoma Heart Hospital and Hamlin Memorial Hospital may represent the best "values" when measured by my mechanism above. They each have very high satisfaction scores, along with some of the smallest charges, and very high rates of communication by doctors. On the other hand, Crozer Chester Medical Center in Pennsylvania appears to have much lower satisfaction scores and significantly higher charges, as well as poor physician communication.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mastering Medicare Cheat Sheet

Amy Schiffman and I have created an awesome 1-page Medicare Cheat Sheet. You can get it for free by joining the Mastering Medicare subscriber list . Here's a sneak peak

Dr. Alex Mohseni invited to speak at Brault’s Healthcare Leadership Forum about the future of Emergency Medicine services and how ED groups can adapt using telemedicine.

  Dr. Mohseni presented on the topic of how Emergency Medicine groups could expand their scope of practice to the virtual space to and how to do so in a financially viable way.

MasteringMedicare Episode 14: Hospice and Secrets of the Hospice Industry published!

In this Mastering Medicare episode we do a deep dive into Hospice with our guest, Cathy Gurson.  She teaches us everything we ever wanted to know about Hospice. Here are some of the topics we cover: How do people get referred to hospice Hospice is covered 100% by Medicare part A What does hospice cover How to get Part B medical care covered while under hospice Hospice reimbursement model Hospice per diem Three levels of hospice care Pier diem changes at the higher levels of care For profit vs non-profit hospice Hospice certificate of need requirements What questions you should ask about when interviewing a hospice CHAP certification for hospice Transitioning - what does transitioning mean in the context of hospice? How to know when a hospice patient is dying Does hospice pay for food and nutrition Tube feeding hospice patients Measuring mean arm circumference (MAC) as a measure of nutritional decline Who is making the hospice recertification? Hospice patient’s relationships with their